topleft05.jpg (18208 bytes)HOMILY
The Twenty-Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time (A)
28 September 08


 

Several years back—it was 2001 to be exact—the movie, A Beautiful Mind, directed by Ron Howard (remember Opie, of the “The Andy Griffith Show”) and starring Russell Crowe, won four Academy Awards, including the one for Best Picture.  If you haven’t seen or heard about the movie, A Beautiful Mind chronicles the Nobel Laureate John F. Nash’s decades long struggle with schizophrenia.

A mathematician, Nash was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics for his pioneering analysis of equilibria in the theory of non-competitive games.  Game theory emanates from studies of games such as chess or poker. Everyone knows that in these games, players have to think ahead by devising a strategy based upon expected countermoves from the other player(s).  Such strategic interaction also characterizes many economic situations, and game theory therefore has proven to be very useful in economic analysis.  John F. Nash introduced the distinction between cooperative games, in which binding agreements can be made, and non-cooperative games, where binding agreements are not feasible.  Nash developed an equilibrium concept for non-cooperative games that later came to be called the “Nash equilibrium.”

Nash’s was the mind of a genius—A Beautiful Mind—who viewed the world in a way that no one who did not know of his mental disease could have imagined.

Trained in scientific rationality, Nash found himself in his early 30s slipping into the delusional thinking characteristic of persons who are psychiatrically diagnosed as “schizophrenic” or “paranoid schizophrenic.”  As a consequence, Nash resigned his position as a faculty member at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and, after spending 50 days under “observation” at the McLean Hospital, travelled to Europe where he attempted to gain status as a political refugee.  The ruse didn’t work and following his return to the United States, Nash was hospitalized in New Jersey a number of times for five to eight months, always on an involuntary basis, and always attempting a legal argument to earn him release.

It did happen that when Nash had been hospitalized long enough, he finally renounced his delusional hypotheses and reverted to thinking of himself as a human of more conventional circumstances and returned to mathematical research.  However, these were but interludes of enforced rationality, because in his mid 40’s Nash returned to his dream-like delusional hypotheses and again became a person of delusionally influenced thinking but of relatively moderate behavior.  That is how Nash tended to avoid hospitalization and the direct attention of psychiatrists.

Time passed.  Nash gradually began to reject some of the delusionally influenced lines of thinking which had been characteristic of his disease.  This began, most recognizably, with his rejection of politically-oriented thinking as essentially a hopeless waste of intellectual effort.  Think not of his ruse in Europe to be granted the status of a political refugee or of his lawyerly pretentions to earn release from confinement in New Jersey asylums.  No, in this presidential election year, stop and consider Nash’s insight!  To think as politicians think is a delusionary and hopeless waste of intellectual effort!

Ironically, while once again able to think rationally again in the style characteristic of scientists, Nash didn’t experience his return to mental health as a matter of happiness or joy, as if someone had returned from physical disability to good physical health.  One aspect of Nash’s disappointment was that rationality of thought imposes limits upon a person’s concept of his relation to the cosmos.  Nash’s found that his mental disease released him from such limitations.  It was, so to speak, more beautiful to think delusionally than rationally and more pleasurable to live in a fantasy than in reality.

We don’t oftentimes think about it, but that’s exactly what sin does to our minds.  As we allow the power of evil to tempt us to think as delusionary people think (the word “Satan” means “Tempter”), the limitations that moral rationality impose upon us are weakened.  What used to restrain us now appears to be nothing more than utter foolishness as we enter into a heretofore unknown world where there are no moral limits and where a return to the world of moral limits is believed to be utter foolishness.  We yearn to be free from any moral prescription that might restrain our desires...to do what we want, when we want, and how we want.

The mantra of those who have succumbed to Satan’s temptations?  “The Lord’s way is not fair!”

Today’s gospel provides an example of this type of delusional thinking and the world of fantasy Satan invites us to enter.

We all know the fourth commandment teaches, “Honor your father and mother.”  This isn’t a difficult concept to understand and we know that it places moral limits upon us in relationship to our parents.  Even so, many young people find themselves tempted to violate the fourth commandment for a host of reasons, none of which is reasonable.  And, then, young people begin thinking delusionally rather than rationally, for example, arrogantly stating “I will not!” when a parent asks them to perform some chore or by saying “Okay, I’ll do it” and not performing the chore.  This is the stuff of pure fantasy, for no child possesses the freedom or the right to dishonor one’s parents.  But, it sure is fun to live in the world of delusion believing that dishonoring one’s parents is a good thing!

Then there’s also the sixth commandment which we all know teaches, “You shall not commit adultery.”  Again, not a difficult concept to understand and all of us know quite well the moral limits it places upon spouses in their relations with members of the opposite sex.  Even so, many married people find themselves tempted to violate the sixth commandment for a host of reasons, none of which is reasonable.  And, it isn’t long before a married person begins thinking delusionally rather than rationally, for example, convincing oneself that one’s spouse is the source of one’s marital difficulties or that there’s absolutely nothing wrong with infidelity.  Obviously, this is the stuff of pure fantasy, for no spouse possesses the freedom or the right to engage in infidelity.  What else can “I promise to love you, honor you, and obey you all of the days of my life” possibly mean?  But, how many spouses today think it great fun to live in the world of delusion believing that infidelity is a good thing?

We all know the eighth commandment teaches, “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.”  Another simple concept to understand and, again, all of us know quite well that it places moral limits upon what we are free to say about other people.  Even so, many of us find ourselves tempted to violate the eighth commandment for a garden’s variety of reasons, none of which is reasonable.  And, then, as we begin to think delusionally rather than rationally, we convince ourselves that we have every right to gossip about or malign another person.  Obviously, this is the stuff of pure fantasy, for none of us possesses the freedom or the right to engage in bearing false witness.  But, how many of us enjoy living in the world of delusion believing that bearing false witness is a good thing?

Being rational, we know that delusionary people believe their world of fantasy is the world of reality.  For example, an alcoholic or drug addict truly believes that he or she cannot live through the day without a “fix.”  We all know this is delusional and evidence of the addict’s mental disease.  Being rational, we also know that dishonoring parents, committing adultery, or bearing false witness is delusional and provide evidence of the sinner’s mental disease.

St. Paul reminds us that the only way sinners—and that’s all of us—can leave the world of fantasy behind and re-enter the world of reality is to put on the mind of Christ and to share his attitude.  “Do nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory,” St. Paul wrote to the Philippians, “rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves, each looking out not for his own interests, but also for those of others” (2:4-5).

God’s ways are not “unfair.”  Loving God and neighbor as we love ourselves is not a recipe for unhappiness.  That’s all the stuff of delusion.  God’s ways are eminently fair and true happiness is experienced not in selfish but in selfless behavior.  When we not only believe this but also live what scripture teaches, we possess not “A Beautiful Mind” of a Nobel Laureate but “The Truly Beautiful Mind of Christ.

 

 

 

mail2.gif (2917 bytes)      Does today’s homily raise any question(s) that you would like
                   me to respond to? Mail your question(s) by double clicking on
               
    the mailbox. I will respond to your question(s) at my first
                   available opportunity.


   Double click on this button to return to the homily
                                         webpage.